Environmental impact of cool roof paint: case-study of house retrofit in two hot islands

Get the resource

About this entry

Publication Date

June 15, 2020

Open Access

No

Abstract / Description

Cool roofs save energy and are particularly suited for low rise buildings in hot climates. This paper presents results of potential energy savings for existing houses in two islands (Sicily and Jamaica) based on validated thermal models. It also presents the lifecycle environmental impact of the cool paint focussing on both the midpoint and endpoint impact categories and compares these with thermal insulation impact. It was found that significant net energy benefits are possible in both locations by a cool roof, more pronounced in Jamaica, which has no heating demand; savings are comparable with thermal insulation reductions. The environmental impact of cool paint is lower than a variety of thermal insulation materials with the exception of water depletion potential. The main hotspots of the cool paint are the production of the polymer followed by the production of the pigment.

Authors

  • Emmanuel Shittu (Brunel University London)
  • Valentina Stojceska (Brunel University London)
  • Petra Gratton (Brunel University London)

Additional Credits

Maria Kolokotroni (Brunel University London)

Publisher

Energy and Buildings

Suggested Citation

Emmanuel Shittu, Valentina Stojceska, Petra Gratton, Maria Kolokotroni, Environmental impact of cool roof paint: case-study of house retrofit in two hot islands, Energy and Buildings, Volume 217, 2020, 110007, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110007.